读知识>英语词典>Brookings翻译和用法

Brookings

英 [ˈbrʊkɪŋz]

美 [ˈbrʊkɪŋz]

n.  布鲁金斯

双语例句

  • Allan Friedman is the research director for technology and innovation at the Brookings Institution in Washington.
    艾伦·弗里德曼(AllanFriedman)是华盛顿布鲁金斯学会的科技和创新研究中心主任。
  • William Galston of the Brookings Institution has recently completed a research project for the Hewlett Foundation.
    最近,布鲁金斯研究所的威廉。贾斯顿完成了为Hewlett基金会做的一个研究项目。
  • Charles Ebinger studies the politics of energy at the Brookings Institution in Washington.
    查尔斯Ebinger研究在华盛顿布鲁金斯学会的能源政治。
  • Mr. Obama's attention to the privacy rights of foreigners was praised by Brookings Institution senior fellow Benjamin Wittes.
    布鲁克林研究所高级研究员本杰明维特称赞奥巴马对于外籍人士隐私权的重视。
  • Mr Thornton is chairman of the Brookings Institution.
    桑顿是布鲁金斯学会(brookingsinstitution)主席。
  • Bruce Katz is a vice president at the Brookings Institution and co-director of the Metropolitan Policy Program.
    本文作者布鲁斯o凯茨是布鲁金斯学会的副总裁,也是都市政策项目(MetropolitanPolicyProgram)的共同主任。
  • There is always a trade-off between speed and waste, said William Gale, an economist at the Brookings Institution.
    在速度与浪费之间总是会有取舍的,布鲁金斯学会(WilliamGale)经济学家威廉盖尔(WilliamGale)表示。
  • It makes sense to accelerate infrastructure spending during a downturn, when capital and labor are underemployed, says David Dollar, the former country director in China for the World Bank and now at the Brookings Institution in Washington.
    在经济衰退,资金和劳动力利用不充分时,加快基础设施方面的支出合情合理,目前供职于华盛顿布鲁金斯学会(BrookingsInstitution)的世界银行(worldbank)前中国局局长杜大伟(DavidDollar)说。
  • The numbers are worse from 2008 to 2011, according to a Brookings paper by Princeton economist Alan Krueger, and graduate students Judd Cramer, and David Cho.
    根据普林斯顿经济学家AlanKrueger、研究生JuddCramer与DavidCho共同发表的布罗斯金研究文件来看,2008~2011年的数据更糟糕。
  • Kenneth Lieberthal, of the Brookings Institution in Washington, said the opaque nature of Chinese defence spending made it difficult to draw meaningful conclusions about military strategy.
    华盛顿布鲁金斯学会(BrookingsInstitution)的李侃如(KennethLieberthal)表示,中国国防支出的不透明特性,使外界难以对其军事战略得出有意义的结论。